johnstownbuzz.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2012, 03:50:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Congratulations Buzzards!
Closing in on 100,000 posts!!
127274 Posts in 3753 Topics by 186 Members
Latest Member: accousajurore2
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  johnstownbuzz.com
|-+  Topics of Interest
| |-+  Politics
| | |-+  No Civilian Trial For 911 Mastermind- another Obama " Opps"
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: No Civilian Trial For 911 Mastermind- another Obama " Opps"  (Read 511 times)
Aimeey7
Czar
******

Like: +26/-23
Offline Offline

Posts: 1239



« on: March 05, 2010, 02:08:01 PM »

This has to go down as a " WHAT WERE YOU THINKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!" when they decided to try to have a civ trial.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/04/AR2010030405209.html?hpid=topnews



Now, if we can just get a reversal on the pledge to close Gitmo.
Report to moderator   Logged

When the romance goes out of a relationship, I get dressed and go home.
Wifey
Sr. Member
****

Like: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 286



« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2010, 08:43:26 AM »

All together scary if when you think about these are the key people tasked with keeping the nation safe.

 1) they don't see terrorist as enemy combatants they see them as common criminals. When was the last time individuals who were captured on a battlefield were brought into the US court system? Hey and even better why don't we put the lawyers who defend these terrorist in the US attorney's office?  They see Veterans and other groups as more of a threat.

2) They spend more time apologizing to world for what they perceive "wrong with America". Look at how they have kissed Iran's rear to play nice.  Obama has still to realize that its not the US but Iran that he needs to find fault with.

3) He wants to repeal DADT without even a concern to how they will affect the readiness of the military. Its all about keeping his supporters happy. Wonder how he's going to replace the large amounts of people who said they would leave (which was the about the size of the Marine Corps) and its not spelled corpse.

Sorry but Zero not having a clue about National Security shouldn't surprise anyone.
Report to moderator   Logged
WDVE
Newspaper Publisher
**********

Like: +92/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 30198



« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2010, 11:59:51 AM »

"Sorry but Zero not having a clue about National Security shouldn't surprise anyone".

I can't understand how the Whatfreedom's of this country are this blind not to see and understand this.
Report to moderator   Logged

Five Points    "You do the best you can. You put the fire out, and wait for another one".  In memory of Captain Terence Hatton RS 1  FDNY       "Rapid Water"
yoyo
Czar
******

Like: +113/-413
Offline Offline

Posts: 1424

RP2012


« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2010, 05:25:08 PM »

All together scary if when you think about these are the key people tasked with keeping the nation safe.

 1) they don't see terrorist as enemy combatants they see them as common criminals. When was the last time individuals who were captured on a battlefield were brought into the US court system? Hey and even better why don't we put the lawyers who defend these terrorist in the US attorney's office?  They see Veterans and other groups as more of a threat.


So the trial in the linked article is for Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who was captured in Pakistan, not on the battlefields of Afghanistan.  To answer question, Ramzi Yousef along with his two coconspirators, the terrorists who tried to bring down the towers in 1993, were the last terrorist tried in a US District court in New York.  In a little under two years from his capture he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.  As far as I know he has not escaped yet.  Maybe we have done  such a good job at putting these guys away that we forget about it.
Report to moderator   Logged
beeker
Czar
******

Like: +66/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1705


« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2010, 11:01:53 PM »

So the trial in the linked article is for Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who was captured in Pakistan, not on the battlefields of Afghanistan.  To answer question, Ramzi Yousef along with his two coconspirators, the terrorists who tried to bring down the towers in 1993, were the last terrorist tried in a US District court in New York.  In a little under two years from his capture he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.  As far as I know he has not escaped yet.  Maybe we have done  such a good job at putting these guys away that we forget about it.

It's interesting that 9/11 planner Khalid Sheik Mohammed is an uncle of the 1993 WTC attack planner Ramzi Yousef. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Wiener
City Manager
********

Like: +74/-105
Offline Offline

Posts: 6593


Down with the enemies of Freedom and Liberty.


« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2010, 06:07:20 AM »

It's interesting that 9/11 planner Khalid Sheik Mohammed is an uncle of the 1993 WTC attack planner Ramzi Yousef. 

It should not surprise you that these folks are all going to be related.  They are after all the decendants of Esau and we all know where they end up on the spectrum of things in this world.  To bad they don't.
Report to moderator   Logged

"Those that would give up Liberty in the name of security, deserve neither and will loose both."
Ben Franklin
Wifey
Sr. Member
****

Like: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 286



« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2010, 09:25:23 AM »

So the trial in the linked article is for Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who was captured in Pakistan, not on the battlefields of Afghanistan.  To answer question, Ramzi Yousef along with his two coconspirators, the terrorists who tried to bring down the towers in 1993, were the last terrorist tried in a US District court in New York.  In a little under two years from his capture he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.  As far as I know he has not escaped yet.  Maybe we have done  such a good job at putting these guys away that we forget about it.

The question here is what is the difference between "enemy combatant" and "terrorist".  Yousef - terrorist , Mohammed - enemy combatant.

Yousef 1) lived, planned and committed the crime in NYC .  He fled the US and left his computer behind - which was how they tracked him down.  and 2) I don't believe we were fighting AQ.  (Well, we were but no one knew it yet), 3) Yousef was not the military operations chief for AQI.  Mohammed admits 31 acts of terrorism all over the world BEFORE 9/11. 4) There was no military tribunial system to try them in back then. That was a product the Bush Administration.



Mohammad is much more then a terrorist -  he should have never left the military tribunal system.  
« Last Edit: March 07, 2010, 05:27:34 PM by Wifey » Report to moderator   Logged
pbal
Czar
******

Like: +107/-34
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


This isn't 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules.


WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2010, 03:19:02 PM »

I thought they were descendants of Ishmail.
Report to moderator   Logged

What in God's holy name are you blathering about?
RobinQuillonsHair
Czar
******

Like: +69/-154
Offline Offline

Posts: 2634



« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2010, 03:25:52 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEtOALW_VyI
Report to moderator   Logged
yoyo
Czar
******

Like: +113/-413
Offline Offline

Posts: 1424

RP2012


« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2010, 08:12:31 PM »

The question here is what is the difference between "enemy combatant" and "terrorist".  Yousef - terrorist , Mohammed - enemy combatant.

Yousef 1) lived, planned and committed the crime in NYC .  He fled the US and left his computer behind - which was how they tracked him down.  and 2) I don't believe we were fighting AQ.  (Well, we were but no one knew it yet), 3) Yousef was not the military operations chief for AQI.  Mohammed admits 31 acts of terrorism all over the world BEFORE 9/11. 4) There was no military tribunial system to try them in back then. That was a product the Bush Administration.



Mohammad is much more then a terrorist -  he should have never left the military tribunal system.  

3 prisoners of gitmo have been tried under these military tribunals, one was sentenced to effectively 9 months, the other two had their charges dismissed.

Why do you think this is the obvious choice to try these guys?
Report to moderator   Logged
Wifey
Sr. Member
****

Like: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 286



« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2010, 08:48:30 PM »

3 prisoners of gitmo have been tried under these military tribunals, one was sentenced to effectively 9 months, the other two had their charges dismissed.

Why do you think this is the obvious choice to try these guys?

classified information remains classified and will not show up in the NY times.  plus the identity of those involved can be safeguarded to prevent harrassment from terrorist.
Report to moderator   Logged
Aimeey7
Czar
******

Like: +26/-23
Offline Offline

Posts: 1239



« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2010, 10:23:40 PM »

3 prisoners of gitmo have been tried under these military tribunals, one was sentenced to effectively 9 months, the other two had their charges dismissed.

Why do you think this is the obvious choice to try these guys?

You can't make such a judgment simply based on where they were tried, you'd have to get into the details of each case.
 
Besides the tribunal itself, Gitmo has no security concerns, no opportunity for protests, a "big show" etc.
Report to moderator   Logged

When the romance goes out of a relationship, I get dressed and go home.
Wiener
City Manager
********

Like: +74/-105
Offline Offline

Posts: 6593


Down with the enemies of Freedom and Liberty.


« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2010, 08:36:26 AM »

I thought they were descendants of Ishmail.

Ishmael is in there and he has his descendants they live by the sword and they shall die by it.  Look at it as the division inside the Muslim faith, inthere lies the differences between Esau and Ishmael's legacy.
  I love the fact that God pits them against each other, only to unite them against all whom fail to follow the ways of Allah and Mohammad.   

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

If the Christians thought that way, the world could almost be united against them, but that would be a whole nother book.
Report to moderator   Logged

"Those that would give up Liberty in the name of security, deserve neither and will loose both."
Ben Franklin
Daffy Duck
Guest
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2010, 11:27:13 AM »

Northern Muslims trace their descendency from Ishmael, the son of Hagar, Abraham's wife's "handmaiden". Ishmael's "step-brother" was Isaac, who had a son named Esau. However, Esau married his "step-uncle" Ishmael's daughter, hence his "cousin".

Report to moderator   Logged
GONAVY
Hero Member
*****

Like: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 590


Not approved by the obama administration


« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2010, 12:15:00 PM »

I thought they were descendants of Ishmail.

You mean this guy?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ej_PwrjZCs&feature=related
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!