http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/12/AR2010041204107.htmlInteresting.
For one, I can't quite get the glee the writer seems to express over the closing.
I mean, its not as if in the DC suburbs there aren't plenty of alterrnatives.
On the other side, I don't mind a pharmacy operating this way, I wouldn't patronize one, but I have no problem with them doing as they wish-- EXCEPT if I gave them a prescription that they didn't want to fill out of moral reasons AND refused to give it back to me, I;d kick their ass and take it back. That's way over the line.
Then, back to the other side, the writer seems to think if it was a rural area without close alternatives, the pharmacy should be forced to sell everything regardless of their own business/moral preferences.